Jake Beck

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Email

jsbeck@fas.harvard.edu

 

Mailing Address

Department of Philosophy

Harvard University

25 Quincy Street

Cambridge MA 02138

 

Office

103 Emerson Hall

 

Office Hours

Wednesday 3-4 and by appointment

 

 

Bio

 

 

 

CV

 

 

 

Papers

 

 

 

Dissertation Abstract

My research lies at the intersection of philosophy and psychology, and focuses primarily on the nature and structure of thought.  The big questions that keep me motivated are:

 

·         What is thought?  What does it take to be a thinker and how can we tell when a creature has what it takes?  If thoughts are mental representations, what kind of mental representations are they (i.e. how are they structured)?  And for that matter, what are mental representations? 

 

·         How is consciousness related to thought?  Does it play any role in furnishing our thoughts with content?  When our thoughts are conscious, does that fundamentally change their nature?  Or are the conscious properties of thought mere epiphenomena? 

 

·         What are the facts in virtue of which thoughts have the contents that they do?  Are thought contents determinate?  Do the thoughts of animals suffer from greater indeterminacy than the thoughts of humans?  Do thoughts have conceptual content, or might some thoughts have nonconceptual content? 

 

·         How are thoughts related to reasons?  Do all thinkers have reasons, or do thinkers need a special kind of thought to have reasons?  What about moral reasons? 

 

·         How have philosophical conceptions of thought changed over the years?  For example, how do Descartes, Locke, Leibniz and Kant differ in their conceptions of thought?  How do Helmholtz, James and Skinner differ?  And how do all of these conceptions of thought differ from the computational approach delivered up by the cognitive revolution and the computer metaphor? 

 

·         If we want to study thought, how should we divide the work between philosophers and empirical researchers?  Is there any long-term, non-heuristic role for philosophy to play in studying thought?  Or are all questions about the nature of thought ultimately questions for some other discipline to answer, such as psychology or neuroscience?